Parameter identifiability problem in physics-based neural networksRead the article English (automatic translation) |
SummaryThis review argues that Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) can produce non-unique material or operational parameters even when their loss function is reduced to near zero. The article demonstrates, using closed-form examples such as heat conduction, pressure-driven flow, and axial deformation, that data may determine a combination of parameters rather than a single one. It then organizes practical diagnostic tools, including sensitivity matrices, dimensionless scaling, nuisance parameters, and profile-based functions. It also outlines an experimental design workflow that links sensor placement to the target parameter. |
Why it mattersPINNs are increasingly used to infer structural or process parameters from sparse field data. However, low training loss is often mistakenly equated with a well-posed inverse problem. By distinguishing optimization success from identifiability, the article provides engineers with a concrete checklist. This checklist helps diagnose when a seemingly 'converged' PINN is actually underdetermined. The proposed sensor placement and loading workflow can reduce the number of costly re-experiments in structural and fluid mechanics applications. |
Highlights
|
Critical takeThis single-author review, published on a preprint server without institutional affiliation, largely consists of a reorganization of known inverse problem and scaling arguments. It offers no new empirical evidence. The 'exact examples' are analytical toy cases. Furthermore, the experimental design workflow is provided only as a summary outline, and its practical utility remains untested. |