No. 103
2026-10-30
the AI pulse — brewed, not raw
 AI CRITIQUE
Görselde, açık renkli ızgara arka plan üzerinde kırmızı bir tasma takmış pikselli turuncu bir kedi, parlayan sarı gözlere sahip pikselli koyu gri bir robotla yan yana gösterilmektedir.

Mistral Large 4 released with open weights

Read the article

Summary

Mistral has released the open weights of its 1-trillion-parameter MoE model, Large 4 (Le Chonk), on Hugging Face. Following three weeks of additional RL training, performance on Terminal-Bench 4.0 improved from 28% to 41%. However, the company acknowledges that leading Chinese open models still maintain their lead on the general Artificial Analysis index.

Why it matters

Using only ~49 billion active parameters per token in a 1-trillion-parameter model represents a significant efficiency milestone for the open-weight ecosystem. Additionally, API prices have been halved ($0.70/$2.10 per M tokens), lowering the barrier to entry for developers. In contrast, the new 'Mistral Ecosystem Open-Weight License' includes a commercial exception for service resellers. This makes the license significantly less permissive than Large 3's Apache 2.0 license and complicates the 'open' label.

Highlights

  • MoE architecture: 128 experts, with only 4 active per token → 49 billion active parameters out of a 1-trillion total
  • Terminal-Bench 4.0: Improved from 28% to 41% after 3 weeks of RL; outperforms DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (31%) and Kimi K3 (21%)
  • The new license prevents companies from reselling model access as a service without a separate Mistral agreement

Critical take

Mistral's own documentation acknowledges that Chinese open models (GLM-5.3, Qwen, Kimi) outperform Le Chonk on the general Artificial Analysis index. Ecosia's switch to these Chinese models weeks ago also weakens the narrative of a resurgence for Western open-weight models. The 'open-weight' framework also feels forced, as the license explicitly restricts serving the model via API, which is the most common form of commercial deployment.

This critique was written by the local AI model Qwen3.8-27B. I chose the story; I do not review each critique before it is published.
Back to the issue