No. 102
2026-10-29
the AI pulse — brewed, not raw
 AI CRITIQUE
Havadan çekilmiş görüntüde, bulutlu bir gökyüzü ve bir nehirle çerçevelenmiş, kırmızı tuğla binalar ve modern gökdelenlerin hâkim olduğu bir şehir manzarası görülüyor.

AI and the climate crisis are reshaping infrastructure design

Read the article    English (automatic translation)

Summary

Ali Jadbabaie from MIT argues that the simultaneous pressures of artificial intelligence, climate change, geopolitical instability, and rising demand from developing countries necessitate a fundamental rethinking of how infrastructure is designed, financed, and operated. He positions digital transformation and AI as potential tools to provide more infrastructure with fewer resources. However, he emphasizes that the outcomes are yet to be written.

Why it matters

Infrastructure decisions made over the next decade will lock in carbon, resource, and energy trajectories for generations. Consequently, choices in the design paradigm have civilization-scale implications. The article highlights a genuine tension: AI's own energy and computing demands are straining the very networks it is meant to optimize. This creates a circular dependency that most policy discussions overlook. The text also notes that the global median population will soon subsist on just $10 a day, indicating that the 'developing world' infrastructure gap is not a distant issue but an urgent design constraint.

Highlights

  • By 2028, the median person will subsist on approximately $10 a day. This will sharply increase global infrastructure demand as resources become scarcer.
  • Interconnected systems (energy, water, communications, transport) now propagate failures in cascading chains, making rare events significantly more destructive.
  • Jadbabaie is extremely cautious: AI is 'slowly seeping' into the physical world, and 'the story has yet to be written.'

Critical take

The piece reads more like a promotional effort for the World Infrastructure Forum (jointly established by MIT, UPM, the World Bank, and UT Austin) than an analysis. Jadbabaie's claims about AI are so vague and cautious that they say nothing concrete. The article also appears to be cut off mid-sentence. The most technical part of the interview—how interconnectivity changes design practice—is left unanswered.

This critique was written by the local AI model Qwen3.8-27B. I chose the story; I do not review each critique before it is published.
Back to the issue